Economic Linkages
Related Reports
- Household Food Security in the United States in 2011
- Alleviating Poverty in the United States: The Critical Role of SNAP Benefits
- The Food Assistance Landscape: FY 2011 Annual Report
- How Much Time Do Americans Spend on Food?
- Statistical Supplement to Household Food Security in the United States in 2010
- Household Food Security in the United States in 2010
- Food Security Improved Following the 2009 ARRA Increase in SNAP Benefits
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program Final Report: Fiscal 2010 Activities
- RIDGE Project Summaries, 2009: Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Innovation and Development Grants in Economics Program
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2009
- The Food Assistance National Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) Model and Stimulus Effects of SNAP
- Eating and Health Module User's Guide
- Changing Participation in Food Assistance Programs Among Low-Income Children After Welfare Reform
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2008
- Does SNAP Decrease Food Insecurity? Untangling the Self-Selection Effect
- Food Spending Declined and Food Insecurity Increased for Middle-Income and Low-Income Households from 2000 to 2007
- RIDGE Project Summaries, 2008: Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Innovation and Development Grants in Economics Program
- Food Insecurity in Households with Children: Prevalence, Severity, and Household Characteristics
- State Variations in the Food Stamp Benefit Reduction Rate for Earnings: Cross-Program Effects from TANF and SSI Cash Assistance
- Rising Food Prices Take a Bite Out of Food Stamp Benefits
- RIDGE Project Summaries, 2007: Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Innovation and Development Grants in Economics Program
- Food Stamps and Obesity: What Do We Know?
- The 2002 Farm Bill: Provisions and Economic Implications
- Are Lower Income Households Willing and Able To Budget for Fruits and Vegetables?
- Informing Food and Nutrition Assistance Policy: 10 Years of Research at ERS
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2007
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2006
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—Food Spending Patterns of Low-Income Households: Will Increasing Purchasing Power Result in Healthier Food Choices?
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—Overview: Can Food Stamps Do More To Improve Food Choices?
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—Stretching the Food Stamp Dollar: Regional Price Differences Affect Affordability of Food
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—Higher Cost of Food in Some Areas May Affect Food Stamp Households’ Ability To Make Healthy Food Choices
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—How Do Low-Income Households Respond to Food Prices?
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—Nutrition Information: Can It Improve the Diets of Low-Income Households?
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—Making Healthy Food Choices Easier: Ideas From Behavioral Economics
- Can Food Stamps Do More to Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective—How Can We Tell If We Are Making a Difference? ERS Efforts To Improve Evaluation of Nutrition Outcomes
- Can Food Stamps Do More To Improve Food Choices? An Economic Perspective
- Food and Nutrition Assistance Programs and Obesity: 1976-2002
- Could Behavioral Economics Help Improve Diet Quality for Nutrition Assistance Program Participants?
- Characteristics of Low-Income Households With Very Low Food Security: An Analysis of the USDA GPRA Food Security Indicator
- Who Has Time To Cook? How Family Resources Influence Food Preparation
- The 2005 Gulf Coast Hurricanes' Effect on Food Stamp Program Caseloads and Benefits Issued
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2005
- The Food Assistance Landscape: FY 2006 Midyear Report
- Nutrient Adequacy of Children Participating in WIC
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2006, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Food Assistance Landscape, March 2006
- Food Assistance Landscape, September 2005
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2005, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Nutrition and Health Characteristics of Low-Income Populations: Healthy Eating Index
- Nutrition and Health Characteristics of Low-Income Populations: Body Weight Status
- Nutrition and Health Characteristics of Low-Income Populations: Meal Patterns, Milk and Soft Drink Consumption, and Supplement Use
- Nutrition and Health Characteristics of Low-Income Populations: Clinic Measures of Iron, Folate, Vitamin B12, Cholesterol, Bone Density, and Lead Poisoning
- Nutrition and Health Characteristics of Low-Income Populations
- Children's Consumption of WIC-Approved Foods
- Issues in Food Assistance—Effects of WIC Participation on Children's Food Consumption
- An Economic Model of WIC, the Infant Formula Rebate Program, and the Retail Price of Infant Formula
- Estimating Longrun Food Stamp Program Caseloads
- Nutrition and Health Characteristics of Low-Income Populations: Volume I, Food Stamp Program Participants and Nonparticipants
- Food Stamp Certification Periods and Payment Accuracy: State Experience During 1997-2001
- Understanding Fruit and Vegetable Choices—Research Briefs
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2004, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2002
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2003, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Final Report: Fiscal 2002 Activities
- Issues in Food Assistance—How Unemployment Affects the Food Stamp Program
- Issues in Food Assistance—Assessing the Self-Sufficiency of Food Stamp Leavers
- Issues in Food Assistance—How Do Food Assistance Programs Improve the Well-Being of Low-Income Families?
- Issues in Food Assistance
- Issues in Food Assistance—Effects of Changes in Food Stamp Expenditures Across the U.S. Economy
- Community Food Security Assessment Toolkit
- Issues in Food Assistance—The Standard Deduction in the Food Stamp Benefit Formula
- Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor: Demographics of Low-Income Households
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2002, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Household Food Security in the United States, 2000
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Final Report: Fiscal 2001 Activities
- Understanding the Food Stamp Benefit Formula: A Tool for Measuring the Component Effects
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2001, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Final Report: Fiscal 2000 Activities
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 2000, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Final Report: Fiscal 1999 Activities
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 1999, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Final Report: Fiscal 1998 Activities
- Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program, Fiscal 1998, Competitive Grants and Cooperative Agreements Program: Description and Application Process
- Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996
Related Amber Waves Articles
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Linkages with
the General Economy
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is linked
to the general economy in 2 ways:
- SNAP expenditures stimulate economic activity during an
economic downturn, and
- economic conditions affect SNAP caseloads and
expenditures.
SNAP is a counter-cyclical government assistance program--it
provides assistance to more low-income households during
an economic downturn or recession and to fewer households
during an economic expansion. The rise in SNAP participation during
an economic downturn results in greater SNAP expenditures which, in
turn, stimulate the economy.
SNAP Stimulates Economic Activity During an Economic
Downturn
When households spend their SNAP benefits, the direct effects
are increased economic activity by the producers of the goods and
services being purchased, as well as by the retail, wholesale and
transportation system that delivers the goods and services. In an
economic downturn when resources are underemployed, increased SNAP
benefits start a multiplier process with an economic impact that is
greater than the initial stimulus (direct effect). The multiplier
effect results from inter-industry and induced consumption effects.
Inter-industry effects arise from an increase in economic activity
among those industries that provide input supplies to producers and
a delivery system for purchased goods. Induced consumption effects
arise from increased consumption expenditures by households that
receive an increase in earnings from the additional work generated
by new economic production activity.
In The Food
Assistance National Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) Model and
Stimulus Effects of SNAP, Hanson uses an input-output
multiplier model to calculate the economic impact of SNAP benefits
during an economic downturn. The results are similar to those found
by macro-econometric models that account for the underutilization
of labor and capital during an economic downturn, and allows for an
accommodating monetary policy that keeps interest rates from
rising. The report found that:
- An increase of $1 billion in SNAP expenditures is estimated to
increase economic activity (GDP) by $1.79 billion. In other words,
every $5 in new SNAP benefits generates as much as $9 of economic
activity.
- The jobs impact estimates from the Food Assistance National
Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) range from the creation of 9,000
to 18,000 full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs plus self-employment
resulting from a $1-billion increase in SNAP benefits. The jobs
impact estimate of 9,000 FTE jobs plus self-employment, or 10,000
full-time plus part-time jobs plus self-employment, is the
preferred estimate.
- Although SNAP benefits are spent exclusively on food, the
estimated impact of SNAP benefits on agriculture assumes that food
expenditures increase by 26 percent of the increase in SNAP
benefits, with SNAP recipients shifting cash expenditures from food
to nonfood purchases.
- A $1-billion increase in SNAP benefits with the type III
multiplier and import adjustment generates $92.6 million of
agricultural production, $32.3 million of agricultural GDP or value
added, and close to 1,000 agricultural jobs (FTE-jobs plus
self-employment). The increase in agricultural GDP is distributed
between livestock (38 percent) and crop production (62 percent).
The 1,000 agricultural jobs impact from a type III multiplier is a
high end estimate, while the jobs impact estimate of 765 FTE-jobs
plus self-employed from a type I multiplier is a more conservative
estimate.
Economic Conditions Affect SNAP Caseloads and
Expenditures
The effect of economic conditions on SNAP caseloads and
expenditures can be viewed from several broad perspectives:
- Effect of economic conditions and program policy on SNAP
caseloads
- Determinants of SNAP participation by eligible households
- Dynamics of SNAP participation: entry, exit, and duration
- Food price inflation and the purchasing power of SNAP
benefits
Effect of economic conditions and program policy on SNAP
caseloads
There is a strong historical relationship between the
unemployment rate--a key indicator of economic conditions--and SNAP
caseloads. However, the relationship between SNAP caseloads and the
unemployment rate is influenced by changes in program policy and
other factors.
Statistical methods to estimate the impact of economic
conditions on SNAP caseloads take into account the influence of
program policy and other exogenous factors on the caseloads. In
Effects of Economic Conditions and Program Policy on State Food
Stamp Program Caseloads, 2000-2006, Mabli and others found that
for the time period 2000 to 2006, a 1-percentage point increase in
the unemployment rate led to a 5.6 percent to 6.3 percent increase
in participation, including a lagged effect from the unemployment
rate. Given average participation levels over this period, the
impact amounts to an increase of 1 to 1.3 million participants per
1-percentage point increase in the unemployment rate. Based on an
econometric model where the effects of program policy changes are
taken into account, change in economic conditions accounts for
about 50 percent of the change in SNAP caseloads.
Earlier analysis, reviewed in
Issues in Food Assistance: How Unemployment Affects the Food
Stamp Program, used data for 1980 to 1998 and found that a
1-percentage point increase in the unemployment rate led to a 6
percent to 9 percent increase in Food Stamp Program (FSP/SNAP)
caseloads when the effects of program policy changes are controlled
for. This impact amounts to an increase of 1 to 1.5 million
participants for a 1-percentage point increase in the unemployment
rate, given average participation over the period. (See also Determinants
of the Food Stamp Program Caseload).
Determinants of SNAP participation by eligible households
Not all households eligible to participate in SNAP actually
participate, and the percentage of eligible households that
participate varies over the history of the program. Individuals in
some households may not know about their eligibility, while others
may know about SNAP eligibility but choose not to participate.
Understanding the reasons that some eligible households do not
participate in SNAP helps USDA administer the program and reach out
to those needing food assistance who are eligible for SNAP
benefits.
Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program Participation Rates: 2002 to 2009
--On average, 56.5 percent of households
eligible to participate in SNAP have chosen to participate between
1980 and 2009. The highest participation rates for households were
70 percent in 1994 and 72 percent in 2009. After the 1994 high, the
participation rate fell to 48 percent in 2001/2002 but rose to 72
percent in 2009. At the same time, the participation rate for
benefits to participants averaged 70 percent of the benefits that
would have been issued if all eligible households had participated
over the years 1980 to 2009, with a maximum of 87 percent in 1995
and 91 percent in 2008 and 2009. After the 1995 peak, the
benefit participation rate fell to 65 percent in 2001/2002, then
rose to 91 percent in 2008 and 2009.
The fact that the benefit participation rate is larger than the
household participation rate means that the average benefit for
eligible non-participants if they participate in SNAP would be
smaller than the average benefit of participants. Findings show
that lower benefit amounts due to higher income is one of the
primary reasons that households chose not to participate. Economic
conditions, as measured by the unemployment rate, also influence
the decision to participate. A higher unemployment rate is
associated with a higher participation rate. For more information
about the determinants of SNAP participation, see Understanding the Determinants of Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program Participation
and
Effect of State Food Stamp and TANF Policies on Food Stamp
Program Participation.
Dynamics of SNAP participation: entry, exit, and duration
Patterns of entering and exiting from the SNAP program drive
changes in SNAP caseloads over time. Analysis of factors-and
economic conditions are important factors-that lead individuals to
enter and exit SNAP as well as influence how long they typically
participate are the subject of research on the dynamics of SNAP
participation.
One study--Dynamics of Food Stamp Program Participation,
2001-2003
--found that 16.6
percent of entrants had an unemployed family member in the four
months prior to entry, and another 43.0 percent experienced a
decrease in earnings but not through unemployment. The odds of a
low-income household entering SNAP increased by 18 percent for each
percentage point increase in the State unemployment rate.
Similarly, individuals who experience a transition from
unemployment to employment are 1.52 times more likely to exit the
FSP than individuals who remain unemployed.
Another set of studies--Dynamics of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program Participation in the Mid-2000s
and Determinants of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program Entry and Exit in the Mid-2000s
found that 16.6 percent of entrants had an
unemployed family member in the four months prior to entry, and
another 27.4 percent experienced a decrease in earnings but not
through unemployment. Of SNAP participants who exited the
program, 46.4 percent experienced an increase in earnings within
the previous four months. The probability of entering SNAP was
greater in States with higher unemployment rates, with the odds of
a low-income household entering SNAP increasing by 4 percent for
each percentage-point increase in the State unemployment rate.
Food price inflation and the purchasing power of SNAP
benefits
Rising food prices affect the food purchasing power of SNAP
benefits for households as well as the total expense of the program
to the Federal Government. The way benefits are currently adjusted
for food price inflation and how benefits have been adjusted over
the history of the program has changed.
SNAP is designed to provide low-income families with more food
purchasing power to obtain a nutritionally adequate diet. As in
most other Federal Government assistance programs, benefits are
adjusted in response to rising prices--in this case, rising food
prices. The current method of adjustment, which occurs annually in
October, can result in a shortfall between the maximum food stamp
(SNAP) benefit and the cost of a nutritionally adequate diet (as
specified by USDA's Thrifty Food Plan) due to food price inflation
during the year. Alternative adjustment methods that have been used
in the past can reduce the shortfall but will raise program costs.
For more information on this issue, see Rising Food Prices Take
a Bite Out of Food Stamp Benefits.