Net Farm Income Forecast To Be Down
38 Percent in 2009
Net farm income is forecast
to be $54.0 billion in 2009, down $33.1 billion (38 percent)
from the preliminary estimate of $87.1 billion for 2008.
The 2009 forecast is $9.6 billion below the average of
$63.6 billion in net farm income earned in the previous
10 years.
Net cash income, at $68.2
billion, is forecast down $29.3 billion (30 percent) from
2008, and $3 billion below its 10-year average of $71.6
billion. Net cash income is projected to decline less
than net farm income primarily because net cash income
reflects the sale of $1.8 billion in carryover stocks
from 2008. Net farm income reflects only the earnings
from production that occurred in the current year.
Highlights
- After reaching record or near record levels
in 2008, all three measures of farm sector earnings
are forecast to decline in 2009.
- Net cash income is expected to fall 30 percent
to a level below its previous 10-year average.
- Net value added is expected to fall from
a record $135.7 billion in 2008, but remain near its
10-year average because the drop in expenditures for
purchased inputs offset some of the decline in value
of production.
- Net farm income, which was a near record $87.1
billion in 2008, is expected to be $9.6 billion below
its 10-year average in 2009 as a result of reduced net
value added and increased payments to stakeholders.
- Total expenses are forecast to decline for the
first time since 2002.
- The 2007 and 2008 increases in farm expenses, at
$34.8 billion and $22.5 billion, were the largest year-over-year
absolute changes on record.
- The $9.2-billion decline in expenses projected
for 2009 would still leave farm expenses 5 percent
higher than in 2007.
- The 2009 forecast is for a $40.2-billion decline
in cash receipts.
- This $40-billion decline still represents less
than half the combined increase of $83 billion that
occurred over 2007 and 2008.
- Crop receipts would be the second highest on
record in 2009, despite an $18-billion drop to
$165 billion, following gains of more than 20 percent
in each of the last 2 years.
- Livestock receipts are expected to decline $22.1 billion
(15.6 percent) in 2009.
See all Farm
Income data files.
In 2008, the farm sector was whipsawed by highly volatile
domestic and international macroeconomic forces that
were initially favorable to U.S. farmers. Prices of both
farm commodities and farm production inputs spiked in
the first half of the year and then fell in the latter
half. The U.S. farm sector is perhaps more intertwined
with the world economy than ever. Demand arising from
both the growing populations and rising incomes in other
countries has expanded markets for farm commodities and
increased competition for critical production inputs
such as fuel, feed, and fertilizer.
The record net farm income in 2008 was driven by a large
increase in the value of crop production that was only
partially offset by rising costs of production for the
farm sector. The value of crop production exceeded its
previous record (set in 2007) by $31 billion, a 21-percent
increase.
Prices of major crops (corn, soybeans, wheat) trended
upward in late 2007 and continued doing so in the first
part of 2008 as the remainder of the 2007 harvest was
marketed. These prices declined in the latter months
as the 2008 harvests occurred, but remained high by historic
standards.
Exports were strong as a weak dollar relative to other
currencies made U.S. commodities more competitive in
international markets, and ending-year stocks of many
commodities were low. Commodity prices trended downward
late in 2008 as the national and world economies softened.
In 2009, crop prices have continued to decline and prices
for livestock animals and products have experienced sharp
declines. With economic conditions deteriorating worldwide,
demand for exports has tailed off, with few options available
to expand marketing elsewhere. Sharply declining demand
in 2009 has forced farmers to accept prices that are
lower than were expected earlier in the year when production
plans were made.
| Commodity prices |
| Commodity |
2007
calendar
average |
2008
calendar
average |
January 2009
WASDE |
August 2009
WASDE |
| Corn. $/bu. |
3.37 |
4.61 |
3.55-4.25 |
3.10-3.90 |
| Soybeans, $/bu. |
7.81 |
10.58 |
8.50-9.50 |
8.40-10.40 |
| Wheat, $/bu. |
5.74 |
7.73 |
6.50-6.90 |
4.70-5.70 |
| Hogs, $/cwt |
47.09 |
47.84 |
47.00-51.00 |
40.00-41.00 |
| Cattle, $/cwt |
91.82 |
92.27 |
91.00-97.00 |
84.00-86.00 |
| Milk, $/cwt |
19.13 |
18.29 |
11.80-12.00 |
12.10-12.30 |
d
See monthly prices for crops
and livestock.
See annual prices for commodities.
Corn production
is projected to total near 13 billion bushels in 2009,
which would be the second highest on record. Soybean production
is projected to be nearly 3.2 billion bushels, which would
be the highest on record.
With abundant production and shrinking demand, crop
prices have been lower in the 2008/09 marketing year,
which includes the 12 months following the 2008 harvest.
With large quantities of most grains and oilseeds available
to market, lower prices have pulled down receipts and
production value from 2008's record level. The value
of crop production is projected to decline by 9.8 percent
in 2009.
A substantial reduction in milk prices going into 2009
signaled the same outcome for livestock commodities.
Prices for animals and their products have fallen in
2009 because of declining exports and a lag in adjusting
production for changing market conditions and expectations.
Overall, the value of livestock production is projected
down by 15.6 percent in 2009.
On the input side, prices are also projected to be lower
than in 2008, particularly for most manufactured inputs,
feed, and services such as repairs or transportation.
Overall, the reduction in gross income will far exceed
the reduction in production costs, leaving all net measures
of income and output below the record or near record levels
established in 2008.
d
While the value of crop production is expected to decline
in 2009, it is still projected to remain $47 billion
above the average value of crop production over the previous
10 years. The total value of livestock production is
expected to decline by $21.8 billion, led by an $11.8-billion
drop in dairy production and a $7-billion decline in
sales of meat animals (cattle, hogs, and sheep). With
some offset from lower farm production costs (most notably,
feed, fertilizer and fuel) projected in 2009, net value
added is forecast to be down $30.4 billion (22.4 percent).
d
Feed costs are a large component of livestock expenses,
and the exceptionally high prices for feed crops in 2008
were pinching livestock producers. Rising costs cause
livestock producers to eliminate their least productive
animals and cut back in less profitable areas of their
operations. However, in 2009, softening world economies
resulted in lower demand for the better cuts of meat,
resulting in declining revenues that more than offset
declining feed costs.
Net value added and net farm income have followed the
value of commodity production over both the long term
and in year-to-year fluctuations. Because farmers typically
do not vary their production mix dramatically from year
to year, purchases of production inputs have been relatively
stable. Thus, the direction and magnitude of annual changes
in the value of livestock production have arisen primarily
from market prices for livestock and livestock products.
On the other hand, variability in the value of crop production
is determined by both market prices and production levels.
Crop production varies with changes in yields due to weather,
plant disease, and pests.
d
See our glossary for
definitions of terms.
See the official
USDA estimates and forecast tables.
d
d
d
Declines in Cash Receipts Expected
for Most Crops in 2009
Annual receipts from food grains are expected to decline
by almost 29 percent in 2009. This decline mostly reflects
an anticipated 35-percent drop in wheat receipts, with
wheat expected to account for almost 77 percent of food
grain receipts in 2009. Much of the expected decline
in wheat receipts from 2008 to 2009 results from a large
drop in annual price. U.S. wheat exports are down in
the face of large world supplies. U.S. rice sales, on
the other hand, are expected to be up almost 5 percent
in 2009, the result of expected reductions in foreign
rice production and a U.S. record season-average farm
price for the 2008-2009 crop marketing year.
Feed crop receipts, which account for 31 percent of
crop receipts, are expected to decline about 18 percent
in 2009. The decline is led by a 19.6-percent drop in
corn receipts, with corn expected to account for 81.5
percent of feed crop receipts in 2009. Declines in 2009
cash receipts are also expected for hay (6.8 percent)
and barley, oats, and sorghum (17.6 percent). The annual
average prices for feed crops are expected to decline
in 2009. The 2009 corn crop is forecast to be the second
largest on record and this, combined with reduced corn
production in South Africa, Ukraine, Russia, and Mexico
, will probably lead to increased U.S. exports. The expected
decline in cash receipts will be offset by a projected
increase in corn demand for feed and residual use and
ethanol.
Oil crop receipts are expected to remain about the same
in 2009, with soybeans expected to account for almost
93 percent of receipts. Soybean yields in 2009 are expected
to be 2.1 bushels/acre larger than 2008, contributing
to projections for a record U.S. soybean crop. Increased
EU production of oilseeds is expected to reduce EU demand
for U.S. soybeans. Otherwise, overall demand for U.S.
soybeans is expected down only slightly. The annual average
price for 2009 will be held down by sales commitments
made in early 2009 when soybean prices were lower. The
value of U.S. peanuts available for sale is expected
to be down 12 percent from 2008 as a 32-percent decline
in production is offset by large supplies carried over
from 2008.
A large decline (38 percent) in cash receipts is expected
for cotton lint and cottonseed, due to both lower quantities
sold and lower prices. A small increase in world cotton
consumption is expected in 2009, but consumption is expected
to remain well below the annual averages from 2004 to
2007. Higher yields and acreage are predicted to result
in a 3-percent increase in U.S. cotton production in
2009, with a 4-percent increase in upland cotton. A slight
increase in cottonseed production is expected in 2009.
However, a reduction in the number of dairy cows and
increased supplies of other feeds such as distillers'
grains and canola meal are expected to lower feed demand
for cottonseed. Cotton is expected to account for 2.1
percent of U.S. crop receipts in 2009.
Fruit and tree nut cash receipts are expected to decline
by about 11 percent in 2009. Overall prices are expected
to remain fairly stable as higher anticipated prices
for fresh oranges, grapes, peaches, and strawberries
will offset anticipated declines in prices for fresh
lemons, apples, and pears. U.S. peach production in 2009
is expected to decline 5 percent, mostly due to a diminished
California crop. Projected declines in cherry prices
reflect large expected increases for U.S. tart cherries
(32 percent) and an expected record crop for U.S. sweet
cherries (52-percent increase over 2008). Delays are
expected to result in smaller harvests of Valencia oranges
in California. A large carryover of apples from the
2008 harvest combined with an above-average harvest in
2009 is expected to soften apple prices. An expected
decline in the 2009 pear price reflects the large apple
(a substitute for pears) supply and lack of international
demand for pears. A projected dropoff in Mexican grape
imports is strengthening U.S. grape prices in 2009. Fruit
and tree nuts are expected to account for 10 percent
of 2009 U.S. crop receipts.
Vegetable receipts, a bright spot this year, are expected
to increase 7 percent from 2008. Backed by a record processing
tomato crop and greater canning/freezing sweet corn production,
output and value of processing vegetables may approach
record highs in 2009. Although reduced acreage and cool
weather slowed fresh vegetable shipments during the first
half of 2009, receipts were buoyed by prices that were
about 10 percent above their levels a year earlier. Although
fresh vegetable shipments increased with favorable summer
weather, receipts will likely remain steady since lower
prices are expected over the latter half of this year.
Lower prices are also expected in the second half of
the year for potatoes as flat export volume, sluggish
foodservice demand, and little change in production weigh
down cash receipts. The price of dry edible beans hovered
near 2008 levels during the first half of 2009 but is
expected to average below year-earlier levels over the
remainder of the year. While prices for dry edible peas
declined 27 percent over the first half of 2009, lentil
prices were up 3 percent due to limited supplies and
strong export demand. In 2009, vegetables and melons
are expected to account for 13 percent of total crop
receipts.
Global Economic Uncertainty and Reduced Prices Drive
Animal Sector Receipts Down in 2009
Cash receipts for livestock, dairy, and poultry are
forecast to be $119 billion in 2009, down 15.6 percent
from 2008, with declines in sales across all major livestock
categories. The U.S. animal sector is projected to account
for 41.9 percent of total agricultural cash receipts in
2009, down from 43.5 percent in 2008.
Soft consumer demand is expected to dramatically reduce
milk prices for farmers in 2009. When coupled with reductions
in the U.S. dairy herd, dairy cash receipts are projected
to be down 34 percent from 2008 levels. While milk supplies
are forecast to remain similar to last year, farm prices
for milk are expected to decline significantly for much
of the year. A slight price recovery is expected toward
the end of 2009 as excess cows are liquidated. Weaker
global demand for dairy products, a strengthening U.S.
dollar, and drought recovery in Australia and New Zealand
are expected to stifle export growth in the U.S. dairy
sector in 2009.
Cash receipts for cattle and calves are expected to
decrease 10.1 percent in 2009. The July 1, 2009 U.S.
cattle and calf inventory was 1.5 percent lower than
the previous year's, and the lowest since the series
began in 1973. Cattle-on-feed inventories on July 1,
2009 were the lowest since 1999. Net placement of cattle
in feedlots of 1,000-plus head during June 2009 was the
second lowest for a month since December 1995. All this
reflects the ongoing national cow herd liquidation and
long series of mostly negative feeding margins since
May 2007. U.S. beef exports continue to be hurt by weakened
foreign economies. The U.S. is expected to export about
1.7 billion pounds of beef in 2009, a 9-percent decline
from 2008. Beef exports declined slightly in the second
quarter of 2009 due to weaker demand from Canada, Mexico,
and South Korea. However, a weak U.S. dollar relative
to the yen and expensive Japanese beef have helped U.S.
beef exports to Japan improve this year.
Hog producers' cash receipts are expected to decrease
13 percent in 2009. The global recession has reduced
both domestic and foreign demand, resulting in low pork
and hog prices. Summer 2009 prices were lower due to
weak demand, and second-quarter pork exports dropped
31 percent from second-quarter 2008 as Asian market demand
weakened. For 2009, the USDA expects hog prices to average
$40-$41 per cwt, almost 15 percent below 2008's prices.
Commercial pork production in 2009 is expected to be
more than 2 percent below production in 2008, but the
sharper decline in pork demand accounts for the projected
decline in hog receipts.
Cash receipts for broilers are anticipated to decline
2.6 percent in 2009. Broiler meat production declined
sharply in the first half of 2009, while second-half
production is expected to be only slightly lower than
the second half of 2008. Exports of broiler meat are
expected to decline. Cash receipts from egg production
are expected to decrease around 24 percent in 2009. Although
feed and energy prices are lower, a drop in egg prices
discouraged producers from increasing egg production.
Even with U.S. egg prices forecast down from 2008, egg
exports are expected to decline, especially to Japan.
Production Expenses
Forecast To Achieve First Year-Over-Year Decline Since
2002
Following an increase of $22.5 billion (8.4 percent)
in 2008 to a record-high $290.0 billion, total production
expenses are forecast to decrease $9.2 billion (3.2 percent)
in 2009 to $280.8 billion, the second highest level ever.
This drop would be the first since 2002. Between 2002
and 2008, expenses rose $99 billion (52 percent). Given
the magnitude of the increase in cost experienced in
this 6-year period, the reduction projected for 2009
is welcomed, especially since gross income is slated
to fall 10 percent in 2009. Despite the decrease, forecast
expenses for 2009 would constitute the largest percentage
of gross farm income, 84 percent, since 1984.
d
Feed, fertilizer, and fuels/oils should drop more than
$3.0 billion apiece in 2009. Livestock and poultry purchases
are the only other expense that will fall more than $1
billion. Expenses on four other items are forecast up
more than $1 billion: seeds, interest, net rent to nonoperator
landlords, and capital consumption. Sizeable reductions
in prices paid for inputs, especially the 30-percent
fall in prices paid for fuels, are the primary factor
in the decreases. Regarding quantity factors, total output
is expected to increase slightly in 2009, as crop output
rises 1.8 percent and livestock output drops 2.0 percent.
After rising $5.0 billion (12 percent) in 2008 and $18.9
billion (67 percent) over the last 3 years, feed expenses
are expected to drop $3.1 billion (6.7 percent) in 2009.
The decrease is due to a combination of a projected 4.8-percent
fall in prices paid for feed and the 2.0-percent decline
in livestock output. Prices paid for grains used as feed
are forecast to fall nearly 20 percent. Because corn
accounts for around 90 percent of feed grains used for
feed and soymeal is the principal oil crop product used
as feed, prices paid for grain feeds depend mainly on
the prices for these two commodities. The forecast 2009
calendar-year average prices of both are down 16 percent.
Despite these drops, however, prices paid for complete
feeds have risen 15 percent since the beginning of the
year. These persistent prices have kept the prices paid
for all feed from declining further. On the quantity
side, the number of grain-consuming animal units (GCAUs)
for the calendar year is forecast down 3.2 percent. Cattle-on-feed
are expected to be lower in each quarter in 2009 than
they were in 2008 as both net placements and total supply
decline 4 to 5 percent. Pork and broiler production are
forecast down 2.4 percent and 3.8 percent respectively.
Milk production is expected to decrease 1.1 percent.
Livestock and poultry purchases are forecast to drop
$1.4 billion (8 percent) in 2009. Since cattle and calf
purchases account for more than 75 percent of this expense,
the situation in this market has the biggest effect on
these purchases. Presently, the impact of the current
economic downturn, which is dampening beef demand and
exports, is outweighing the positive effects of declining
feed costs. In January 2009, the ERS
High Plains Cattle Feeding Simulator showed losses
of more than $24/cwt on fed steers marketed during that
month. Due to these negative conditions, the price of
feeder steers in 2008 fell to its lowest level in December
2008. Starting with fed steers sold in April 2009, lower
feed costs and feeder prices put cattle feedlots in a
profitable position for the first time since May 2007
(Livestock,
Dairy, and Poultry Outlook, May 2009). In response
to the expected continuance of lower feed costs and a
resultant rise in demand for feeder cattle, prices for
feeders have started climbing and are forecast higher
in the fourth quarter of 2009 than they were in the fourth
quarter of 2008. Demand for feeder cattle will be dampened
to some extent, though, by low fed-cattle prices. Prices
paid for milk cow replacements were trending down in
late 2008 and have fallen 34 percent since December as
a large number of cows are being sent to slaughter because
of projected low milk prices in 2009. Lower product demand
and lagging exports are forecast to cause the annual
average farm price for hogs to be down 9 percent (Livestock,
Dairy, and Poultry Outlook, July 2009). Prices paid
for feeder pigs soared during the first 4 months of 2009
before sinking nearly 62 percent by July. The price of
broilers is forecast to be up.
After rising $8.5 billion (21 percent) in 2008 to $49.4
billion, the principal crop-related expenses are forecast
to fall $3.2 billion (6 percent) to $46.2 billion in
2009. Seed expenses are up significantly but fertilizer
expenses are set to decline much more. One indicator
of crop-related expenses, acres planted of the 14 principal
field crops, is projected to fall about 1 percent in
2009. Field crop production is forecast to be 2.7 percent
higher. Production of fruits and nuts will decrease while
production of vegetables and greenhouse/nursery products
will increase a small amount.
Following an increase of $2.5 billion (20 percent) in
2008, seed expenses are forecast to rise another $2.2
billion (14.5 percent) in 2009. Seed prices have been
rising rapidly since 1999 because of biotechnology advancements
and the resultant improved yield potential (Crop
Production Cost and Outlook, FAPRI). Since then,
prices paid for seeds have risen 146 percent, with 64
percent of that rise occurring during the last 3 years.
Prices paid for seeds increased 26.5 percent in 2008
and are expected to rise another 15.5 percent in 2009.
In April 2009, the price of hybrid corn seed was up 31.5
percent over April 2008 and the price of soybean seeds
had risen 24.5 percent.
After rising $4.8 billion (27 percent) in 2008, fertilizer
expenses are forecast to drop $5.6 billion (25 percent)
in 2009. These nearly offsetting changes are due almost
entirely to the roller-coaster movement of prices paid
for fertilizer since December 2006.
Until recently, fertilizer prices had been rising steadily
since 2002. The annual average prices paid for fertilizers
rose 264 percent through 2008, with sharp increases in
2007 and the first half of 2008. In response, farmers
have reduced their fertilizer purchases when possible.
Farmers could not avoid the run-up in fertilizer prices
during the first half of 2008. However, as prices continued
to rise through September, they began to curtail purchases,
particularly because the plummet in wholesale prices
during the last 3 months of 2008 was not matched by a
drop in retail prices. Many farmers held off purchasing
fertilizer as they waited for retail prices to come down.
Because of this postponement, some purchases that would
usually have been made in late 2008 were made in 2009
instead. This pattern could add to fertilizer expenses
in 2009 and limit the drop in 2009's fertilizer expenses
to less than forecast. The annual average prices paid
for fertilizers are currently predicted to fall 18 percent
in 2009. But retail prices were still relatively high
during the first half of 2009, when operators were forced
to purchase fertilizer. By July, fertilizer prices had
almost fallen back to 2006 levels and are projected to
rise only slightly through the end of the year. With
more normal fertilizer prices at the end of the year,
farmers will probably return to their normal purchasing
patterns in the later months of 2009 and purchase fertilizer
for fall operations or prepurchase for use in 2010.
Pesticide expenses are forecast to be up only about
$240 million higher (2 percent) in 2009. Prices paid
for pesticides should increase 3.0 percent in 2009, but
a slight decrease in quantity applied is expected.
Fuel and oil expenses are forecast to decrease $4.9
billion (30 percent) in 2009. Like fertilizer prices,
prices paid for fuel rose dramatically between 2002 and
2008. During this period, annual average prices paid
for fuel jumped 207 percent and fuel prices registered
6 straight double-digit percentage increases. Prices
paid for fuels have fallen since July 2008, however.
By the end of December 2008, fuel prices were down 50
percent and stood 31 percent lower than in December 2007.
The annual average prices paid for fuel should fall nearly
30 percent in 2009. Refiner Acquisition Cost (RAC), the
average price of domestic and foreign oil, remained around
$40 through the first quarter of 2009, a drop of 57 percent
from 2008. RAC has been slowly climbing through July
and is projected to finish the year in the high $60's
(Energy Information Administration: Table
2. U.S. Energy Nominal Prices). This rise in prices
during the latter part of 2009 is significant because
questions about the timing of input purchases on the
2003 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) showed
farmers purchasing 50 percent of their fuels in the third
and fourth quarters. Lower planted acreage in 2009 will
likely prompt a reduction in fuel use during the year.
Payments to Stakeholders (Providers of Hired Labor,
Rented Land, and Debt Capital)
Although total expenses are expected to fall in 2009,
payments to stakeholders are projected to increase around
$2.8 billion (5.7 percent). In 2009, payments to stakeholders
will constitute 49 percent of net value added, up from
36 percent in 2008. The ratio of payments to stakeholders
to total expenses has been dropping since it reached
a peak at 26.5 percent in 1984. In 2009, the ratio should
rise slightly to over 18 percent from 17 percent in 2008.
Following a $0.9-billion (5-percent) rise in 2008,
employee compensation (hired labor) is forecast to be
up around $700 million (3 percent) more in 2009. Farm
wage rates are projected to be up around 2.5 percent.
Fruit and nut, vegetable, dairy, and greenhouse/nursery
operations are the heaviest users of hired labor. The
production of fruits/nuts and milk are slated to fall
in 2009, vegetable production will likely remain about
the same, and greenhouse/nursery production should be
up a small amount.
Net rent to nonoperators is expected to rise around
$1 billion (11 percent) in 2009. The increase would be
the result of a rise of about 3 percent in cash rent,
a fall of 9 percent in share rent, a 6-percent increase
in landlord government payments, and a sizeable jump
in FCIC payments to landlords. The rise in cash rent
will occur because cropland rental rates are up 5.3 percent,
even though average land values are down (Agricultural
Land Values and Cash Rents Annual Summary, August
2009). Acres planted to principal crops are down 1 percent;
the drop in share rent follows the decline in the value
of crop production.
Interest expenses are forecast up nearly $1.1 billion
(7.3 percent) in 2009.
Government Payments
Forecast at $12.6 Billion
Direct government
payments are expected to total $12.6 billion in
2009, a slight increase from $12.2 billion paid out
in 2008. This level would be 20 percent below the 2004-08
average. Direct payments under the Direct and Countercyclical
Program (DCP) are forecast at $5.15 billion for 2009.
Direct payment rates are fixed in legislation and are
not affected by the level of program crop prices. A
delayed signup for the 2009 crop shifted some direct
payments into calendar year 2009, but was partially
offset by reduced direct payments for farmers opting
for the Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE).
ACRE, authorized by the Food, Conservation, and Energy
Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Act), provides revenue insurance
to producers in exchange for a 20-percent reduction
in their annual direct payment allotments beginning
with the 2009 crop year. Because producers' enrollments
are lower than expected and the enrollment season just
ended, the effect of ACRE participation on direct payments
in calendar year 2009 is not yet known.
Countercyclical payments are forecast to increase from
$712 million in 2008 to $1.23 billion in 2009. The drop
in cotton prices in the latter half of 2008 is responsible
for this projected increase. Since 2006, only upland
cotton and peanuts received countercyclical payments,
but only cotton is receiving countercyclical payments
in 2009.
Marketing loan benefitsincluding loan deficiency payments,
marketing loan gains, and certificate exchange gainsare
projected at $906 million in 2009, up from $316 million
in 2008. In 2009, upland cotton producers realized almost
95 percent of the total marketing loan benefits. The
other crops receiving marketing loan benefits are wheat,
barley, peanuts, wool, mohair and pelts. Although prices
have declined from their peaks in 2008, marketing loan
benefits are still not available to the remaining program
crops at current price levels.
The Milk Income Loss Contract Program (MILC) compensates
dairy producers when domestic milk prices fall below
a specified level. High prices in 2008 meant that only
small program overpayments repaid by producers were recorded.
For 2009, current economic uncertainties have reduced
both domestic and export demand for dairy products to
such an extent that the rapid fall in milk prices is
expected to generate $1.1 billion in MILC payments.
Forecast at $740 million in 2009, Tobacco Transition
Payment Program (TTP) payments are expected to continue
declining beyond 2009, albeit at a decreasing rate. Payments
reported here include both CCC payments and lump-sum
payments. Begun in 2005, this program provides annual
payments over a 10-year period to eligible quota holders
and producers of tobacco. Since the inception of the
program, lump-sum payments to individuals have been made
through agreements with third parties in return for the
producers' and quota owners' rights to the 10-year TTP
payment stream. While significant lump-sum payments were
made in 2005 and 2006, fewer producers and quota owners
are currently participating in these buyout agreements.
Conservation programs include all conservation programs
operated by USDA's Farm
Service Agency (FSA) and Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) that provide
direct payments to producers. Estimated conservation
payments of $3.23 billion in 2009 reflect programs being
brought up toward funding levels authorized by current
legislation.
Ad hoc and emergency disaster program payments are forecast
to be $260 million in 2009. Disaster payments appropriated
under Title IX – Agricultural Assistance - of the U.S.
Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and
Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, were largely
paid out in 2008hence, the projected 90-percent
drop in these payments in 2009. The 2008 Farm Act created
a permanent fund for disaster assistance, the Agricultural
Disaster Relief Trust Fund. Producers in disaster counties
who are eligible for Supplemental Revenue Assistance
Payments (SURE) made from this trust fund will begin
receiving payments in calendar year 2010.
d
| Farm Income Forecasts
Grow More Refined Over 19 Months The periodic
farm income forecasts and estimates published by
ERS over the course of a crop year (5 over a span
of 19 months) can vary markedly from one release
to the next. For example, the first forecast of
2009 income (in February 2009) undergoes painstaking
refinement as new information becomes available.
Release dates for the updated forecasts correspond
with the availability of seasonal data and annual
survey results. For example, an August 2009 update
of annual crop values benefits from preliminary
output and yield numbers as reported by producers
in the field. Likewise, production expenses can
be extrapolated from prior-year expense data and
several months of current-year input prices. Additional
refinements in November and the following February
(2010) incorporate harvest, sales, and inventory
data. Ultimately, an August 2010 estimate of 2009
farm income will be published.
Individual components of the farm income accounts
adhere to different timetables and are subject to
varying degrees of uncertainty. For instance, crop
inventory adjustment is a residual component of
total supply (production and beginning-of-year stocks)
and use (domestic and exports). Farm household income
is contingent on many factors (amount of off-farm
work hours and wage rates) that transcend crop and
livestock numbers. Government paymentswhich
are a function of prices, production, eligibility
rules, and ad hoc disaster legislationare
also hard to forecast with any certainty, and that
uncertainty compounds the margin of error that measures
like net cash income are subject to from first forecast
to final estimate.
Crop and livestock receipt forecasts tighten significantly
as additional price and output data become available
during the forecast period. As a result, by harvest
time, the relative error (between forecast and actual
totals) is generally less than 2 percent for total
cash income and less than 5 percent for net farm
income. Of course, in absolute terms this can amount
to as much as $4 billion across the farm sector.
|
See glossary.
See all Farm
Income data files.
|