Data Sets
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Publications

agricultural outlook

June/July 2001

Economics Editor: Dennis A. Shields

This issue was published in June 2001 by the Market and Trade Economics Division.


Agricultural Outlook is published 10 times per year by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. The contents section at the bottom of this page links to each article in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.

Release of summary for the August 2001 issue: July 19, 2001. Release of complete text-only version: July 20.

About AO    Editorial staff    Subscribe    Statistical indicators
Past Issues
—pdf
   Past Issues—text only  5-Year Index

In this issue...

Abundant Field Crop Supplies Expected in 2001/02—Large supplies of major U.S. field crops are expected again in 2001/02, keeping downward pressure on farm prices for the fifth year, according to USDA's first forecast for the season. Soybean supplies are expected to be record large, and average farm price is forecast to drop about 5 percent from 2000/01. Corn prices are expected to be relatively unchanged, as higher carry-in stocks largely offset lower production. Wheat deviates from the general projection, with production down 12 percent and season-average farm price up 16 percent. Gregory K. Price (202) 694-5315.

Meat & Poultry Production To Rise Slightly in 2002—Production of red meat and poultry in 2002 is forecast at nearly 83 billion pounds, up 1 percent from this year's expected level, and marginally higher than the 2000 record. Continuing increases in pork and poultry production, bolstered by profitability and continued low corn and soybean meal prices, will more than offset a modest decline in beef output. Despite record red meat and poultry supplies, relatively strong domestic and foreign demand are maintaining prices. Leland Southard (202) 694-5187.

Plenty of California Peaches & Nectarines Expected in 2001—Despite some adverse winter and spring weather, California should harvest a plentiful supply of peaches and nectarines this year, forecast down just 5 percent from 2000. While stone fruit supplies should be ample to meet summer demand, reduced production and high quality may push up prices from last year. Export markets, if they are as strong as last year's, could also help boost prices for stone fruits. Agnes Perez (202) 694-5255.

Mexican Cattle Exports to U.S.: Current Perspectives—For generations, cattle have played a key role in bilateral trade between the U.S. and Mexico, and the composition of cattle trade has remained relatively constant. The U.S. exports breeding stock and cattle for slaughter to Mexico, while Mexico exports primarily feeder cattle (young stock to finish gaining weight in feedlots) to the U.S. The U.S. is expected to remain a major market for Mexican cattle producers, who raise cattle suited for feeding with seasonal forage supplies. Leland Southard (202) 694-5187.

China's Fruit & Vegetable Sector: A Changing Market Environment—China's potential as a strong competitor in international fruit and vegetable trade will likely be realized over the next several years. Although China exports less than 1 percent of its fruit and vegetable production, private-sector investment is creating world-class operations that deliver high-quality fruits and vegetables within China and to international markets. Growth in domestic demand, improvements in marketing practices, and China's future agricultural policies will largely determine how soon and how strongly its produce sector affects U.S. and world markets. Dennis A. Shields (202) 694-5331.

Using Farm-Sector Income as a Policy Benchmark—Measures of farm-sector income are valuable indicators of how well U.S. agriculture is performing, but may not fully capture the financial situations of farmers and farm families. Intended policy outcomes and the actual results often diverge because aggregate measures do not reveal the wide variations in income and circumstances among various farm groups, do not reflect off-farm income and wealth, do not reveal farmers' debt problems, and give no indication of how many farms fail financially. Mitch Morehart (202) 694-5581.

Impact of Government Payments to Farms Varies by Level of Profitability & Household Income—High levels of government payments to the U.S. farm sector have forestalled a significant drop in national farm income in recent years. While payments boost both profitability and household income, the gains in profitability are disproportionately greater for farms with the highest and lowest rates of return, and the income gains are greater for those at the lowest and highest ends of the household income distribution. Jeffrey Hopkins (202) 694-5584.

Government Payments to Farmers Contribute to Rising Land Values—Value of agricultural land depends largely on its expected future earnings from farming. Government payments indirectly support farmland values and contribute to higher rents, generally benefiting farmland owners. But for farmers who rent the land they operate, higher rental rates can increase the risk of operating losses if commodity prices and government payments decline. ERS analysis indicates that the contribution of government payments to U.S. farmland value rose from about 13 percent during 1990-97 to 25 percent during 1998-2001. James Ryan (202) 694-5586.

Falling Prices & National Farm Policy: The Northern Great Plains—Fluctuating crop prices and farm incomes can affect the economic well-being of rural communities and even entire regions. This is especially so in the Northern Great Plains. Low crop prices during 1998-2000 triggered marketing loan benefits (MLBs) and emergency market loss assistance payments (MLAs), propping up farm income and generating spillover effects in the regional economy. A regional economywide model shows the effects of MLBs and MLAs in stemming losses in jobs and in gross regional product when crop prices decline. Stephen Vogel (202) 694-5368.

 


This publication is in Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 PDF format. You can download and get help using the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print this document. Text-only versions of Agricultural Outlook are also available, immediately after publication clearance.


Contents


Blue arrow Entire issue


Past Issues
5-Year Index
Top of page

Contact Mary Reardon

For more information, contact: Some Body

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: June 5, 2001