|
The basic indicators of household
well-being—average (or median) income and wealth—do
not adequately convey information about how financial
well-being is distributed among the population or information
about non-financial measures of well-being. Of special
interest, for example, are farm households that are experiencing
financial hardship. Indicators that contribute to our
understanding in measuring the size of this population
include:
Other indicators of well-being, besides income- and wealth-based
indicators, include:
Poverty
The U.S. Bureau of the Census establishes an annual poverty
threshold to measure the share of the population with
low incomes. One way in which the farm population was
identified in the past was based on whether or not they
resided on a farm. In 1959, about half of all farm residents
were below the official poverty line, compared to 20 percent
of nonfarm residents. The gap in the poverty rates narrowed
considerably over time, so that by the late 1980s, poverty
rates of farm residents were at or below the rates for
nonfarm residents.
The farm resident population gradually ceased to be
representative of the farm operator household population
(since not all operators live on their farm and others
who are not operators live on farms) and so, more recently,
poverty rates have been calculated for farm operator households.
(For the years when data are available for both populations,
farm residents have lower poverty rates than do farm operator
households.) Based on the official poverty threshold,
8.4 percent of farm operator households were in poverty
in 2006, compared to 12.3 percent of the general U.S.
population. Poverty rates are higher in nonmetropolitan
areas than they are in metropolitan areas for both the
general population and the farm household population.
However, it is important to keep in mind that poverty
rates are incomplete indicators of well-being since they
only look at income sources, not wealth.
Farm Households' Well-Being Includes
Income and Wealth
In a variable-income/high-wealth sector such as farming,
well-being measures based on both income and wealth can
provide a better indication of a household’s capacity
to maintain its standard of living than a measure of income
taken in a single year. During downturns in income, farm
households may be able to borrow against, or liquidate,
assets. To jointly consider both income and wealth, farm
households are divided into four groups, separated into
low and high levels of income, and low and high levels
of wealth, with the median levels of U.S. household income
or wealth as the dividing lines between low and high.
Median income (or wealth) is the level at which 50 percent
of households have greater income (wealth) and 50 percent
have less.
d
There is a difference between farm and other U.S. households
in the pattern of wealth compared to income. In 2006,
less than 5 percent of all farm households—in contrast
to 50 percent of all U.S. households—had wealth
less than U.S. median household level (see table).
The 96 percent of farm households with high wealth are
split into two groups, with 55 percent having income higher
than the U.S. median and 41 percent having income lower
than the U.S. median. The major difference appears to
be that, on average, the low-income/high-wealth group
tended to have incurred farm losses during the year, and
their off-farm income was not sufficient to offset these
losses.
So who is in the small group of low-wealth households?
On average, the low-wealth group was younger (virtually
none was retired), operated substantially fewer acres,
and generated lower farm sales than the farm operator
population as a whole. They reported substantial losses
in the off-farm component of household income. Among low-wealth
households, a major factor differentiating the high-income
subgroup from their low-income counterparts is occupation:
their primary occupation is disproportionately “other
than farming/ranching,” whereas the low-income group
was more evenly split between operators declaring farming/ranching
or “other” as their primary occupation.
It is not surprising to find that farm operator households
have more wealth than the average U.S. household because
capital assets, like farm land and equipment, are generally
necessary to operate a successful farm business. In general,
all households with self-employed heads have greater wealth
than the average U.S. household. Farm operator households
have greater wealth than all U.S. households with a self-employed
head.
d
The distribution of farm households in each income/wealth
group has been relatively consistent over time. However,
there seems to be an increase in the share of farm operator
households found in the most financially secure group
of both higher income and higher wealth, and a slight
decline in the share of farm households falling into the
other groups.
Health Insurance Coverage
Health insurance provides individuals or groups with
a contractual arrangement for personal medical expenses
to be covered (usually, in part) in exchange for a fee
paid to insurance companies. The terms and expense of
health insurance plans vary widely. Because medical attention
is relatively expensive and can significantly affect morbidity
and mortality, the incidence of health insurance among
populations is an important indicator of their well-being.
In 2006, 15.8 percent of the U.S. population had no form
of health insurance. For members of farm operator households,
the comparable figure was 13.8 percent. Having health
insurance is closely associated with a person's age and
income—coverage increase with both age and income.
Virtually all U.S. citizens age 65 or older have some
coverage through Medicare. Farm operator households, are
more than three times as likely as other U.S. households
to be headed by an individual over 65. Farm operator households
also have higher incomes, on average, than the general
U.S. population. Because health insurance is expensive,
Americans with low incomes are less likely to have health
insurance.
Most Americans receive health insurance through their
employers. Although farm operators are largely self-employed,
the majority of farm operator households have the operator
or spouse employed off the farm. As with the general population,
the most common source of health insurance for members
of farm households is employment-based. In fact, farmers
are almost as likely as the general U.S. population to
receive their health insurance through an outside employer.
Only about 6 percent of farmers receive their health insurance
through the farm businesses they operate. Farmers are
more likely than the general population to directly purchase
their health insurance from an insurance company, and
less likely to receive health insurance from a Government-sponsored
program, such as Medicare, Medicaid, or the Veterans Administration.
Household Living Expenses
Farm household income varies over time, but living expenses
are more constant over time. (Included in our measure
of household expenditures are food, housing, education,
transportation, medical expenses, insurance and retirement
plan contributions, entertainment, charitable contributions,
and other household expenses.)
Farm households are likely to save from current income
to maintain a certain level of household expenditures
and/or to alter their spending when they expect income
changes to be permanent. Thus, living expenses can provide
a less erratic indicator of the well-being of households
over time, compared to income. Expenses also tend to be
more equally distributed across farm households than are
income and wealth.
Farm earnings are not closely tied to household expenditures
for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, most farm
households receive most of their income from off-farm
sources. In addition, expenditures are driven in part
by the household’s expectation of usual income,
rather than the current year’s farm income which
is more variable. Unlike farm earnings, household expenditures
are not closely associated with farm size because many
small farms have considerable off-farm income and net
worth.
The household expenditures of farm operator households
generally increase as the income (from both farm and off-farm
sources) increases. This is true for all U.S. households
as well. At lower income levels, farm households have
higher average expenditures than the general population.
As income levels increase, the general U.S. population
has proportionately higher expenditure levels than the
farm operator household population. At the highest income
category of $70,000 and above, for example, average expenditures
of the general U.S. population are more than 50 percent
greater than farm households. Perhaps, this is evidence
that farm households tend to save in high-income years
in anticipation of possible future low-income years.
The average farm operator household has historically
had household expenditures less than the average for all
U.S. households, although the gap has been narrowing over
time. Part of the reason for the lower expenditures of
farm households is that most farm households live on the
farms they operate and their farm business provides them
with a farm dwelling. In the case where the farm business
provides the housing to the household, the cost of housing
is not included in household living expenditures. The
average U.S. household spends nearly one-third of its
consumption expenditures on housing.
d
Farm Fatalities and Injuries
The farming environment has some unique features that
place workers and their households at greater risk for
injuries and illnesses than many other work environments.
Home and worksite are the same location for most farm
operations, exposing farm family members to hazards associated
with animals, machinery, tools, and chemicals. Farming
activities are dictated by weather, season, and climate.
During planting and harvesting periods, farmers, their
family members, and hired workers tend to work long hours
while operating equipment and handling livestock. Farmers
and farm workers often work alone and far from medical
assistance should an injury occur. Measures of fatalities
and injuries, especially relative to other occupations,
provide a good indication of the safety of the farming
occupation.
Farming has one of the highest fatality rates of all
occupations, according to the U.S. Department of Labor,
which reports fatality rates for workers based on their
major occupation. While the overall fatality rate in the
United States in 2006 was 3.9 per 100,000 workers, the
rate for those with farming or ranching as a major occupation
was more than nine times that rate—37.1 per 100,000.
Nearly three-quarters of the fatalities in farm operator
households occur in households where farming is the operator’s
major occupation.
d
Between 1992 and 2006, the Department of Labor reported
that fatal injuries, as a rate per 100,000 workers, were
generally increasing for farmers and ranchers, while the
much lower fatality rate for all U.S. workers had declined
further. The number of farmers and ranchers with a major
occupation of farming or ranching has declined over this
period, while the number of fatal injuries has not declined
as much. The fatality rate is greater for crop production
than it is for animal production. Looking at all workers
with a major occupation in these industries, including
operators, the fatality rate in crop production has averaged
more than twice that of the animal production industry.
d
Farm Operators' Perceptions
About Satisfaction With Their Place of Residence
A subjective indicator of the well-being of farm households
is self-reported satisfaction with aspects of quality
of life. In a 2005 national survey of farm operators,
respondents were asked to identify their views about their
place of residence. In particular, they were asked to
report whether 10 characteristics about their place of
residence were a major problem for them and their households.
These characteristics covered employment, health, education,
geographic access and the social environment of their
place of residence.
More farmers identified access to airports as a major
problem with their place of residence than any other characteristic—nearly
one-third did. A close second characteristic that was
identified as a major problem was crime and vandalism
(30 percent). In contrast, only 6 percent indicated that
access to schools was a major concern.
d
|