USDA Soybean Baseline, 2010-19
Each year, USDA updates its 10-year projections of supply
and utilization for major field crops grown in the United
States, including soybeans (see Overview
of the USDA Baseline Process for more information).
One key use of the projections is as a reference from
which to analyze the impacts of potential policy changes
affecting U.S. agriculture. This discussion summarizes
the analysis underlying the soybean projections for 2010-19.
Details about the projections for the U.S. macroeconomy,
other U.S. crops, U.S. livestock, the U.S. agricultural
sector, and global agricultural trade can be found in
the Agricultural
Baseline Projections briefing room.
Growth of the U.S. soybean industry could slow over the
next 10 years as it faces stronger foreign competition
and U.S. farmers shift acreage into feed grains. Although
net returns for soybeans might rise to uncommonly high
levels, they could be low relative to corn and gradually
limit U.S. soybean acreage. In the projections, soybean
production declines initially (2010/11-2011/12) and then
increases incrementally with a modest improvement in yields
and planted acreage. The expected growth in U.S. soybean
supply should allow for a moderate rise in domestic use
and exports. However, exporters from South America are
expected to garner most of the expansion in global trade
for soybeans and soybean products, much of which will center
on meeting a rapidly rising demand in China.
Supply
Several factors underlie the long-term trends that will
determine the size of U.S. soybean crops during 2010-19.
U.S. soybean planted area may have peaked. U.S.
soybean acreage expanded throughout the 1990s as farm program
changes increased planting flexibility and encouraged
more farmers to incorporate the crop into their rotations.
In 2009, planting delays for spring grains and favorable
relative prices prompted farmers to sow a record 77.5 million
acres of soybeans.

Although expected net returns for planting soybeans
might become less attractive throughout the Corn Belt,
it continues to expand in areas historically dominated
by small grains (the Northern Plains in particular).
Stagnant spring wheat yields and the development of better
yielding short-season soybean varieties adapted to the
northern climate have facilitated a shift away from wheat
toward soybeans. For instance, soybean acreage planted
in North Dakota has more than doubled since 1999. Soybeans
have been welcomed into Northern Plains crop rotations
to help break the cycle of wheat diseases and, unlike
in more traditional soybean producing regions, returns
per acre favor soybeans over many other crops.
Recent U.S. soybean yields have been excellent.
While soybean acreage is still expanding into northern
and western parts of the country, those areas tend to
have lower yields than the core midwestern production region.
This expansion and a tapering off of the yield gains
from narrow-row planting have slowed the upward trend
in the national average yield. Throughout the 1990s,
adoption of narrow-row planting practices benefited soybean
yields as it usually increased the number of pods per
acre. In more recent years, there has been a clear shift
away from 7- to 8-inch rows toward 15-inch rows in an
effort to improve air circulation and combat disease-related
yield losses. In 2009, ample summer moisture led to a
record yield of 44 bushels per acre. Incidences of Asian
soybean rust in the United States have been limited to
the South, where losses have been minimized by timely
application of fungicides.
Demand
Over the next 10 years, several long-term trends will
determine domestic and foreign demand for U.S. soybeans
and soybean products.
Exports from South America have expanded rapidly.
South American soybean harvests have set record highs
nearly every year for almost a decade. Over the past
5 years, exports from the region have surpassed U.S.
foreign trade in soybeans. However, that trend was
interrupted for the 2009/10 marketing year (September-August).
In 2008/09, Argentina suffered from a historic drought
that slashed soybean production and exports. In
Brazil, the 2008/09 soybean area was constrained by
high production costs and poor financing. Although
Brazil’s exports in 2008/09 soared to fill the
void from Argentina’s small crop, carryover stocks
were drawn unusually low. Consequently, U.S. exports
for 2009/10 are expected to increase to a record high
due to a higher supply and low stocks in South America.
It should not take long for Brazil to regain export supremacy
as production costs of its soybean farmers are very competitive
relative to U.S. producers. Tempering the profitability
of growing soybeans in Brazil, however, are the high fuel
prices that raise transportation costs from producing regions
to export markets. Long-term improvements in Brazil's transportation
infrastructure must be completed before the country can
more fully realize its massive potential in global agricultural
markets. Also, the growth in Brazil’s soybean
area will be heavily influenced by the country’s
exchange rate against the U.S. dollar, which affects domestic
prices for soybeans.
Domestic soybean use not dynamic. Intense
competition from soybean processors in Brazil, Argentina,
and, more recently, China has eroded foreign soybean
meal markets away from U.S. crushers. China has also
imported large amounts of U.S. soybeans that would otherwise
have been available for crushing. Domestic crush margins
have suffered from a declining supply and comparatively
weak prices for soybean meal and soybean oil. In addition,
domestic consumption of these products has not grown
very much. Consequently, the domestic crushing pace is
starting to slow down even earlier in the year.
Growth in domestic soybean meal use is gradual. The
low rate of growth in U.S. soybean meal consumption is
determined by a comparatively slow expansion of meat
production and a rising supply of substitute protein
feeds. Also, over the last decade, intense competition
from soybean processors in Argentina and Brazil with
U.S. crushers has gradually cut into the U.S. share of
foreign markets for soybean meal and soybean oil. China's
processors have also imported large amounts of U.S. soybeans
that could otherwise have been available for domestic
use. Lackluster domestic use and the pressure of foreign
competition kept U.S. prices for soybean meal and soybean
oil comparatively low. Thus, whenever soybean supplies
fell, profit margins of domestic processors would stagnate.
Over the past 4 years, however, record domestic supplies
of soybeans have improved the economic conditions for
U.S. processors, while adverse weather has disrupted
crop supplies for Brazil and Argentina. In addition,
an expansion of biodiesel production throughout the world
is raising the value of soybean oil relative to soybean
meal. In order to produce soybean oil for a growing biodiesel
industry, its joint output with soybean meal is creating
a larger exportable surplus of meal.
Biodiesel is leading consumption gains for soybean
oil. For the past 5 years, food demand for soybean
oil has stagnated as food manufacturers have sought
out vegetable oils that are low in trans-fatty acids. Eventually,
a wider distribution of low-linolenic and high-oleic
soybean varieties could diminish these disadvantages.
Offsetting the weak food demand are gains in U.S. production
of biodiesel, which uses soybean oil as a major feedstock. New
construction of biodiesel production facilities was
accelerated by passage of a Federal tax incentive starting
on January 1, 2005. The exemption, which was extended
through 2009, provided a Federal excise tax credit
(at 1 cent per gallon for each percent that is used
in a fuel blend) to blenders using biodiesel. Until
early 2009, a majority of the output was exported.
Recent exports were reduced due to the abolition of
the blending credit for re-exports of biodiesel imports
and the European Union’s imposition of countervailing
duties on imports from the United States. Biodiesel
contributes to the lubricity needs of low-sulfur diesel
fuel, as required under recently implemented emission
standards. Biodiesel now accounts for about 13 percent
of the domestic use of soybean oil.
Although U.S. exports of soybean oil are expected to
increase in 2009/10 to a record high, rising demand for
soybean oil in domestic biodiesel production will likely
constrain them in subsequent years. Since 2003/04, the
United States has been a net importer of all vegetable
oils and a continued expansion of biodiesel output would
amplify the trend. Considerably higher costs for
vegetable oils and competition from biodiesel imports
would temper the industry’s growth.
Projections for U.S. Soybean Supply and Use
U.S.
soybean projections for 2010-19 include the following
highlights.
Projected soybean acreage initially declines and
stabilizes later. In 2010 and 2011, planted soybean
area in the United States is expected to decline.
By the spring of 2010, it is assumed that producers
will react to the price pressure from bumper South
American harvests. Most of the reduction will come
from producers switching to corn in the traditional
Corn Belt, although some will be in the South due
to lower double-cropping with wheat and substitution
with cotton. Despite lower acreage, total 2010/11
soybean supplies are projected to increase moderately
due to a larger carryover from 2009/10. The 2010/11
carryout could be even bigger and is projected to
depress the 2011 soybean acreage to 73.5 million
acres. Soybean acreage could recover to 76 million
acres by 2014 and remain steady through 2019. It
is assumed that a reduction in the maximum enrollment
for the Conservation Reserve Program will help return
more than 2 million acres of cropland in 2010, which
in later years could help support U.S. soybean acreage.
Steady yield gains allow for modest growth in soybean
production. U.S. soybean yields are projected to rise
on average by 0.4 bushel per year, based on regional yield
trends for 1960-2009. The national average soybean yield
is projected at 42.8 bushels per acre in 2010. Soybean
acreage is expected to shrink for 2 years, gradually increase
for 3 years, and then plateau. Rising yields (to 46.5 bushels
per acre by 2019) would likely provide the majority of
the output gains during the period. The projections
assume no extreme weather or extensive outbreaks of soybean
rust, which could reduce yields and raise production costs
in any of the projection years.

Gradual output growth supports domestic
needs and U.S. exports. Assuming lower acreage
in 2010/11, supply could expand moderately due to ample
carryover stocks. Thereafter, a slowly rising
supply is projected, supporting a gradual increase
in domestic use and exports. Domestic crushing
could increase moderately toward 1.86 billion bushels
by 2019/20. Assuming a steady increase in domestic
demand for soybean meal and soybean oil, the soybean
crush is projected to rise by 15-20 million bushels
per year.

In 2010/11, large expected supplies by export competitors
could reduce U.S. soybean exports to 1,300 million bushels. Assuming
a strong expansion of foreign exports, the U.S. share
of the global market could be reduced within 10 years
to 38 percent—compared to 45 percent for 2009/10.
Nevertheless, rising foreign imports could boost U.S.
soybean exports to 1,455 million bushels by 2019/20.

The U.S. export share of the world soybean oil market
is also assumed to shrink for several years as domestic
users take more of the available supplies (particularly
for biodiesel). Foreign import demand for soybean oil
should stay robust, though. Vegetable oil imports
by the European Union (EU-27) are expected to rise rapidly
to meet ambitious targets for biofuel production. In
South America, rapidly growing domestic markets for biodiesel
will likely compete for soybean oil supplies and constrain
exports.
The U.S. share of global soybean meal exports is benefiting
from ample supplies in 2009/10 and may reach a record
10.2 million tons. In subsequent years,
however, the market share should gradually erode despite growing in absolute
terms. U.S. soybean meal exports are projected
to edge up to 9.8 million short tons by 2019/20 from
9.4 million for 2010/11.
Soybean prices stable near a historically high level.
Over the next decade, there may only be a slight increase
in domestic soybean stocks, rising to no more than 7 percent
of total use in any year. Throughout the next 10 years,
the U.S. average soybean farm price is expected to range
near $9.20-$9.25 per bushel. Such a price level may not
be sufficient encouragement to increase U.S. soybean acreage,
though, given that corn may have superior comparative returns. Eventually,
however, the prices are seen capable of soliciting a strong
supply response from South American producers, who would
find them sufficiently attractive. Following a strong
increase for soybean meal values in 2008/09, prices have
started to ease in 2009/10 and could remain mostly steady
thereafter. Processors may be compensated for the
steady soybean meal prices with rising values for soybean
oil, which would strengthen crush margins. Soybean oil
prices are assumed to be supported by a worldwide tightening
of the vegetable oil market, accelerated by expanding global
biodiesel production.

Projections for World Soybean Trade
During 2010/11-2019/20, gains in world soybean trade will probably moderate from
the 7-percent annual growth in 1999/2000-2008/09, but the upward trend is far
from peaking. Global
soybean trade is projected to rise nearly 3 percent annually to 104 million
metric tons in 2019/20.
China will dominate world soybean imports. The
growth in China’s
soybean imports is assumed to dwarf all other countries,
accounting for 78 percent of the projected gain in world
trade by 2019/20. By 2010/11, the volume of soybean crushing
in China could surpass that of the United States, the
world's current leader. That development would likely
promote a faster growth rate for global soybean imports
than for soybean
meal and soybean
oil. However, any disparity in the rates of consumption between protein meal
and vegetable oil in China could temper that expansion. China's imports of vegetable
oil will likely rise, provided that its consumption continues to grow faster
than its domestic demand for protein meal (and including its ability to export
possible meal surpluses). China has already surpassed India as the world's largest
importer of soybean oil.
The regions likely to tally most of the remaining import
gains for soybeans are Latin America, North Africa, and
the Middle East. In contrast, soybean meal consumption
for the EU has slowed in 2009/10 due to improved domestic
crops of grains and oilseeds. For the following years,
EU demand could erode gradually as use for other oilseeds,
particularly rapeseed, is assumed to expand. This would
prompt only modest growth in EU imports of soybean meal
and a moderate reduction in soybean imports. Also,
weak gains for feed demand in Japan and Taiwan (a consequence
of rising meat imports) are likely to elicit minimal gains
in soybean imports by both countries.

Brazil closes the gap on U.S. production and
exports of soybeans. The United States, Brazil,
and Argentina collectively account for more than 90
percent of world exports of soybeans, soybean meal,
and soybean oil. Although the same 3 countries
will stay on top, Brazil is projected to satisfy most
of the growth in global soybean exports. By 2019/20,
Brazil will approach the United States as the world's
leading soybean exporter.
Argentina should continue to dominate world exports of
soybean meal and soybean oil, as the country's modest domestic
use and differential export taxes make it comparatively
economical to process soybeans there. Argentina is assumed
to maintain taxes on soybean exports at a higher rate than
the exports of soybean meal, soybean oil, and biodiesel,
which favors demand by domestic processors. However, as
Argentina closes in on its practical limits for productive
farmland and the production of soybeans, production and
exports by Brazilian processors could gradually gain market
share. Argentina may see its soybean exports drift lower
so that the country’s large crushing industry can
operate near full capacity. That domestic supply could
be supplemented with rising imports (mainly from Paraguay),
provided that Argentina restores a tax incentive that was
formerly provided to soybean imports.

|