|
Grazing lands are vegetative land area that can be used for the feeding of domestic animals on growing grass, legumes, and other herbaceous plants. Grazing lands encompass a broad range of land types defined by climatic zone, terrain, vegetative cover, and primary land use. Lands used for grazing may include rangelands, grazed forest lands, native grasslands, naturalized and cultivated pasture, and crop and hay lands.
Private grazing land defies easy definition, due to
the diversity and multi-use nature of lands used for
grazing, distinctions in private ownership and lease
arrangements, and land-capability and land-use distinctions
across primary sources of grazing land data. Private
grazing lands generally include all privately owned,
fee-title land used for grazing purposes. Grazed acreage
on tribal lands and public lands under State and local
jurisdiction, which may be eligible for USDA program
assistance, are often subsumed under working definitions
of private grazing lands.
Extent and Location of U.S. Grazing Lands
Nearly 35 percent of the total U.S. land area, or 783
million acres of combined Federal and non-Federal lands,
was potentially usable for livestock grazing in 2002. This
includes 587 million acres of permanent grassland pasture
and rangeland, 62 million acres of cropland pasture, and
134 million acres of forested rangeland. For details,
see the Major Land Uses
data product.
Non-Federal grazing landsincluding privately
owned land, State and local publicly owned lands, and
tribal landsaccounted
for 577 million acres in
2002. Over 488 million acres of private and tribal lands
were used for grazing purposes in 2002, including pastureland
and rangeland (395.3 million acres), forested land used
for pasture (31.1 million acres), and cropland (61.8
million acres). Private grazing lands are located in
all States, with heavy concentrations in the Mountain
and Plains regions. In the more humid Eastern States,
cropland pasture represents a significant share of acreage
grazed.
In the
West, public lands are used for livestock grazing in
designated areas. Federal grazing leases administered
by the Bureau
of Land Management covered 160 million acres (U.S.
Department of the Interior) and USDA's
Forest Service administered
an additional 95 million acres of grazing land.
| Private grazing lands used
by livestock producers, by region, 2002* |
| Region |
Pasture, cropland** |
Pasture,
woodland |
Other
pasture & rangeland |
Pasture,
all types |
| |
Mil. acres |
% |
Mil. acres |
% |
Mil. acres |
% |
Mil. acres |
| Northeast |
1.5 |
41 |
0.7 |
19 |
1.5 |
40 |
3.6 |
| Appalachia |
7.2 |
42 |
3.4 |
20 |
6.3 |
38 |
16.8 |
| Southeast |
3.6 |
26 |
3.6 |
26 |
6.5 |
47 |
13.8 |
| Lake States |
1.9 |
34 |
1.5 |
26 |
2.2 |
39 |
5.6 |
| Corn Belt |
7.3 |
37 |
3.8 |
19 |
8.6 |
44 |
19.6 |
| Delta States |
3.6 |
35 |
2.0 |
20 |
4.6 |
45 |
10.2 |
| Northern Plains |
8.2 |
10 |
0.9 |
1 |
70.5 |
89 |
79.5 |
| Southern Plains |
18.5 |
15 |
5.8 |
5 |
99.1 |
80 |
123.5 |
| Mountain |
7.2 |
4 |
5.7 |
3 |
166.7 |
93 |
179.6 |
| Pacific |
2.8 |
8 |
3.7 |
11 |
27.7 |
81 |
34.3 |
| Alaska/Hawaii |
0.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
3 |
1.6 |
94 |
1.7 |
| |
| All U.S. |
61.8 |
13 |
31.1 |
6 |
395.3 |
81 |
488.2 |
Note: Percent indicates the share
of each region's grazing land by pasture type.
*Includes
farm and ranch operations with $1,000 in annual
sales. Values include grazing on American Indian
lands.
**Reported Census acres of cropland used for
pasture were adjusted to reflect the share of
animals not raised on farms, as defined by the
Census (personal correspondence, Marlow Vesterby,
ERS).
Northeast = ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT, NY, NJ, PA, DE,
MD. Appalachia = VA, WV, NC, KY, TN. Southeast =
SC, GA, FL, AL. Lake States = MI, WI, MN. Corn
Belt = OH, IN, IL, IO, MO. Delta States = MS, AR,
LA. Northern Plains = ND, SD, NE, KS. Southern Plains
= OK, TX. Mountain = MT, ID, WY, CO, UT, NV, AZ,
NM. Pacific = WA, OR, CA. Alaska/Hawaii = AK, HI.
Source:
USDA/NASS 2002 Census of Agriculture. |
Significance of Grazing Lands for the U.S. Animal Sector
Grazing lands provide essential forage for the U.S.
animal sector. In 1997, roughly 57 million animal-units
(AUs) of 1,000 lbs of live weight were raised, in part,
on forage from grazing lands. This accounted for about
60 percent of AU production on U.S. farms. Cattle,
cow-calf, and calf-growing operations are the dominant
grazers, with lesser acreages used for sheep, goats,
horses, ponies, mules, burros, donkeys, bison, and llamas.
| Number of animal units*, total
and unconfined, by operation size, 1982 and 1997 |
| |
1982 |
1997 |
| Farms by number
of AUs |
All animals (mil. AUs) |
Unconfined animals (mil. AUs |
Percent share unconfined |
All animals (mil. AUs) |
Unconfined animals (mil. AUs) |
Percent share unconfined |
| Less than 25 |
7.3 |
6.7 |
92 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
96 |
| 25 up to 50 |
9.5 |
7.5 |
79 |
7.3 |
6.4 |
87 |
| 50 up to 150 |
29.0 |
17.5 |
60 |
21.5 |
14.9 |
69 |
| 150 up to 300 |
17.1 |
10.3 |
60 |
16.0 |
9.9 |
62 |
| 300 up to 1,000 |
16.9 |
10.9 |
65 |
20.3 |
12.1 |
60 |
| 1,000 and more |
15.8 |
7.2 |
46 |
24.9 |
8.8 |
35 |
| Total |
95.6 |
60.1 |
63 |
95.3 |
57.3 |
60 |
*Animal-unit numbers by farm size
were calculated based on beef and dairy cattle, swine,
and poultry. Other animal types that are typically
pasturedincluding sheep, goats, horses, ponies,
mules, burros, and donkeysrepresent an additional
3.5 million AUs.
Source: Adapted from Kellogg et al.,
2000, and Kellogg, 2002, based on USDA/NASS Agricultural
Census data for 1982 and 1997. |
An estimated 707,365 animal farms had mostly pastured livestock in 1997, representing 54 percent of all farms with animals. These farms accounted for $17.2 billion in livestock sales, or 17 percent of U.S. livestock sales in 1997. Most are small operations (less than $10,000 in annual sales) that raise primarily livestock. However, a significant minority raise large numbers of animals; 10 percent of these farms had livestock sales of more than $40,000.
Other farms may also use grazing lands. Farms
with few animalsraised primarily for home consumption or local marketsare
likely to depend on pasturing for feed needs. Pastured livestock are more common
on operations of fewer than 50 AUs. Some confined livestock farms (predominantly
cattle feedlot and dairy operations) may depend on forage grazing for some
animals over part of the year, and may have large numbers of pastured livestock
(confined livestock may be pastured for up to 45 days per year). An increasing
concentration of unconfined animals on larger operations (greater than 300
AUs) over 1982-97 mirrors a similar trend in confined animal production.
Additional Benefits of Grazing Lands
Grazing lands support activities other than livestock
production that contribute to rural economies, such as
hunting and fishing, wildlife viewing, and other ranch-based
recreation. Fees generated from these uses supplement
income for some animal producers and may help sustain
operations. Grazing lands are also regarded as an integral
part of the cultural heritage and identity of many rural
communities.
Grazing lands, where properly managed, provide important
ecological functions. Grazing lands help to maintain
habitat and migration corridors for wildlife, supporting
a rich biodiversity of plant and animal species. As grazing
lands account for large acreages in many U.S. river basins,
they are important in hydrologic processes involving
streamflow, aquifer recharge, and water filtration. In
addition, grazing lands sequester substantial amounts
of atmospheric carbon. Potential gains from cropland
conversion to grassland have been considered in the context
of U.S. policy on climate change mitigation.
Grazing Lands and the Environment
Two broad areas of environmental concern involve the loss of private grazing land area and resource degradation on grazing lands.
Area Loss
Conversion of grassland for crop production and developed
uses has reduced the extent
of native grasslands in the U.S. by roughly 50 percent
since 1700 ,
with significant fragmentation of remaining grassland resources.
Losses have been greatest in the historic savanna and tall-grass
prairies of the Midwest and Central Plains, and relatively
less in the arid West where nonirrigated cropping potential
is limited and much of the land is publicly owned. While
the rate of loss has slowed in recent decades, area in
grasslands and other grazing land resources continues to
decline.

Cropland expansion has fueled much of the grassland conversion, particularly in years of strong crop demand. More recently, increases in population and income have driven substantial exurban development in grasslands. Reductions in grazing land resources nationwide, however, may mask variability in land-use coverage over time. In marginal cropping areas, cropland conversions (and reconversion to grassland) may be influenced by relative returns to crop and livestock production and changes in agricultural policies. In some locations, Federal cropland retirement initiatives have resulted in increased grassland area, which may be grazed under specified conditions.
Resource Degradation
Of the current remaining grassland resources in private
ownership, much of this acreage
has been degraded due to overgrazing, fire suppression,
invasive species, and other factors. Degradation of the
land resource is reflected in reduced forage productivity
for livestock and in environmental damages, both on and
off the site.
Environmental effects of livestock grazing may include excessive foraging and trampling of vegetative cover, streambank erosion, and sediment/nutrient loadings to water bodies that may harm riparian and upland habitat. Livestock grazing has been cited as a factor in the decline of threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. Of 663 species identified as affected by agricultural activity (as of September 1995), livestock grazing was a factor in 171 listings (26 percent).
Considerable policy attention has focused on animal waste management in recent years, with new Federal regulations enacted in 2003 for the largest confined animal operations. Waste from unconfined (pasture-based) operations remains largely unregulated, although it may impair local water quality. Roughly half of the manure nutrients produced on U.S. animal farms was generated by unconfined livestock in 1997, including 3.3 million tons of manure nitrogen (51 percent) and 1.0 million tons of manure phosphorus (54 percent).
Improving Grazing Systems
Increased policy attention has focused on livestock
grazing systems that are environmentally and economically
sustainable. Field studies suggest that grazing lands
can be managed to enhance forage productivity while preserving
environmental quality. Practices undertaken as part of
an improved grazing system include rotational grazing
to allow grass rejuvenation; fencing to restrict livestock
access in sensitive areas; watering facilities to remove
livestock from riparian areas; windbreaks and shelterbelts
to disperse herds; manure storage facilities for temporary
confinement areas; filter strips to intercept runoff
from heavy-use areas; improved grass and legume cultivars;
improved nutrient management practices; and integrated
pest management strategies.
Producer returns may also increase from improved grazing
practices. Benefits may include additional quantity and
quality of forage; healthier livestock and lower veterinary
costs; better monitoring of livestock, resulting in earlier
problem detection; higher weaning weights; and reduced
problems with noxious weeds and other undesirable plant
species. In many cases, however, public incentives will
be required to encourage adoption of recommended grazing
practices, particularly where benefits primarily occur
offsite.
Federal Support for Conservation on Private Grazing Lands
The Federal Government provides conservation information
and technical assistance for private grazing lands, primarily
through USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS). Non-Federal grazing lands constitute about
half of the total land on which NRCS provides technical
assistance. According to NRCS, roughly 355 million acres
of private grazing lands are in need
of some form of conservation treatment.
Comprehensive nutrient management plans (CNMPs), designed
to minimize water quality impairment from manure nutrients,
are an important element of an overall conservation plan
for many animal operations. Of an estimated 257,201 farms
with confined animals in 1997 that were likely to need
CNMPs, roughly one-fourth had pastured animals as the
dominant type. Average
annual CNMP costs per farm with pastured livestock
were estimated at $1,450.
The Environmental
Quality Incentives Program (EQIP),
introduced in 1996 and extended under the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm
Act), provides technical and financial assistance to
address natural resource concerns on working farms
and ranches. Cost-share and incentive payments under
5- to 10-year contracts are available for eligible
practices in an approved conservation plan. Sixty
percent of EQIP funding under the 2008 Farm Act is targeted
to livestock production,
with improved grazing systems as an important element.
From 1997 through 2007, more than $76.3 million in EQIP
cost-sharing payments were approved for grazing land
practices, accounting for approximately 12 percent of
total practice payments under the program.
The 2008 Farm Act includes several other programs that
support conservation on grazing lands:
- The Grassland
Reserve Program (GRP) targets grazing operations
on private grasslands. The GRP, administered jointly
by NRCS and the Farm Service Agency (FSA), was authorized
in 2002 and extended under the 2008 Farm Act. The
program is designed to preserve grasslands for livestock
grazing and other uses. Enrollment options include
permanent easements with a single upfront payment
and long-term rental agreements (10, 15, and 20 years)
with annual payments. An approved grassland resource
management plan is required for all enrolled lands,
with cost-sharing provided for the use of approved
restoration practices.
- The Conservation
Reserve Program (CRP) administered by FSA since
1985, targets removal of environmentally sensitive
lands from agricultural production under 10- to 15-year
lease agreements. Much of the CRP enrollment involves
marginal croplands in grassland areas of the Plains.
Enrolled lands are planted to native grasses and
other vegetative cover, and pasturing is permitted
(subject to reduced CRP payments) as part of an approved
conservation plan.
- The Conservation
Stewardship Program (CStP), which replaces the
Conservation Security Program administered by NRCS
since 2002, provides financial and technical assistance
to farmers and ranchers recognized as exemplary land
stewards. Pasture and rangeland accounted for more
than 40 percent of total acres approved for contracts
in FY 2008.
- The Farmland
Protection Program (FPP), administered by NRCS
since 1996 (referred to as Farm and Ranchland Protection
Program under the 2002 Farm Act), helps maintain
working cropland and grazing lands by providing matching
funds to State, tribal, and local governments, as
well as nongovernmental organizations, for acquiring
conservation easements.
- Conservation
of Private Grazing Lands (CPGL) program, administered
by NRCS since 1996, authorizes technical and educational
assistance for conservation and enhancement of private
grazing lands.
Factors Affecting Conservation Adoption
on Private Grazing Lands
Returns to ranching in some areas may limit investment
in conservation practices, particularly for smaller operations
with limited capital. Over 1998-2007, average returns
above total costs for cow-calf operations in the U.S.
were considerably less than returns to wheat production.
Conservation adoption incentives may be inadequate under
lower returns to livestock production. This is particularly
true where offsite benefits are not captured by the operator
and landowner, as in the case of measures designed to
protect habitat. Incentives may also be limited for lands
grazed under a lease agreement or informal arrangement,
where the operator does not capture long-term benefits.
USDA farm programs have historically supported returns
to crop producers through price and income supports and
mitigation of crop risk. Farm support payments have largely
been decoupled from production since 1996, but certain
payments (such as marketing loan benefits) continue to
be linked to crop production. Crop insurance subsidies
and ad hoc disaster assistance may further stabilize
income of crop producers. Where USDA programs (marketing
loan benefits, crop insurance and ad hoc disaster assistance)
enhance crop returns relative to livestock grazing in
marginal cropland areas, program incentives may create
a marginal unintended consequence of encouraging grassland
conversion to crop production and discouraging reversal
to grasslands.
Policy mechanisms for conservation on private grazing
lands are largely nonregulatory. While large confined
animal operations are regulated as a point-source for
waste discharge, onsite environmental effects of grazing
are more diffuse and consequently less subject to mandatory
controls. Adoption of conservation measures on grazing
lands has relied largely on technical assistance and
voluntary incentives, without regulatory or compliance
mechanisms to ensure environmental standards.
The proliferation of ranchettes (subdivisions of large
rural tracts) in many areas represents a further challenge
for grazing land conservation. Conservation concerns
can be particularly significant, as smaller land holdings
may be overstocked with animals relative to carrying
capacity and manure-nutrient uptake. As owners do not
generally depend on livestock for income, financial incentives
may be less effective in encouraging improved grazing
systems. Effective strategies may require coordination
of conservation activities across multiple landowners.
Many Western ranches use a mix of Federal, State, and
private lands for livestock grazing over the course of
a year. Access to public lands is often critical to providing
private parcels adequate time to recover within a rotational
grazing regime. For much of the West, the success of
conservation measures on private grazing lands may be
linked to grazing policies for public lands.
|