Amber Waves cover, May 2007
Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America

May 2007

| United States Department of Agriculture | Economic Research Service
Search   GO!  
Current Issue
All Issues
  Amber Waves Home
spacer Up Front
  Feature Articles

Findings

Statistics
  Additional Readings
  About Amber Waves
  E-mail notices

Farm Bill Resources

ERS Newsroom

 

USDA's Economic Research Service

Ad: Print Edition
Click here to subscribe to Amber Waves
Read more about our awards

 

 


AmberWaves May 2007 Special Issue > Statistics > Indicators

Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

Data Feature Heading

On the Map

Originally published Vol. 4, Issue 2 (April 2006)

Roger Claassen

Conservation compliance effectiveness depends on where the money goes

USDA’s Conservation Compliance Program was designed to ensure that Federal farm programs did not encourage crop production on highly erodible land (HEL) in the absence of measures to protect against soil erosion. Under this program, farmers who grow crops on HEL must apply an approved soil conservation system or risk losing eligibility for Federal income support, conservation, and other payments.

The effectiveness of conservation compliance in enhancing soil conservation depends, in part, on the extent to which farms that crop HEL also receive Federal farm program payments. Overall, 86 percent of all cropland and about 83 percent of highly erodible cropland is located on farms that receive farm program payments.

Map: Most farms with highly erodible cropland receive Federal farm program payments


printer iconPrinter-friendly format Download PDF version